Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides Movie 2011 Review

Pirates_of_the_Caribbean-_On_Stranger_Tides_2011-212x300Movie: Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides
Release Date: May 20, 2011 (3D/2D theaters and IMAX 3D)
Studio: Walt Disney Pictures, Jerry Bruckheimer Films
Director: Rob Marshall
Screenwriter: Ted Elliott, Terry Rossio
Starring: Johnny Depp, Penelope Cruz, Ian McShane, Kevin R. McNally, Astrid Berges-Frisbey, Sam Claflin, Geoffrey Rush
Genre: Adventure, Comedy

Story:
Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) has been captured and is about to go on trial for piracy when he learns someone has been impersonating him to put together a crew to find the Fountain of Youth. Once he finds that person, Sparrow is knocked out and brought aboard the Queen Anne’s Revenge, captained by the evil pirate Blackbeard (Ian McShane), whose daughter Angelica (Penelope Cruz) Jack has had relations with. The three of them begin a quest to find the Fountain, the two silver chalices of Ponce de Leon and a single mermaid’s tear necessary for the ritual. At the same time, Sparrow’s arch-rival Hector Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush) has been sent by the King of England (Ricahrd Griffiths) to find the Fountain before the Spaniards.

Analysis:
There’s a famous saying about giving the people what they want and with that in mind, the fourth installment of Jerry Bruckheimer’s pirate adventure franchise, and the first in four years, puts Johnny Depp’s Captain Jack Sparrow front and center for a new adventure that offers a self-contained story, a bunch of new characters, a couple of old standbys, but doesn’t justify itself by barely trying to improve on what’s come before.

The promise in the last scene of “At World’s End” that we’d get Sparrow and Barbossa looking for the “Fountain of the Youth” is only partially true, because we only see Depp and Rush on-screen together once during the first 90 minutes before they make separate quests. It takes over 45 minutes before we’re actually on that journey which gives you some idea how poorly-structured the film is, and it takes about that long to really get into the story.

The last couple of movies tended to hit a hurdle whenever Depp wasn’t on screen, so one would think that focusing more on Sparrow would help this one, but that’s not the case at all. It’s hard not to think that Depp is coasting his way through the movie with this character who has become second-nature to him, but the Sparrow schtick was already getting tired in the previous movie so the movie starts getting dull whenever it’s just Depp doing Sparrow.

Possibly realizing this, “On Stranger Tides” introduces a number of new characters. With Penelope Cruz’s Angelica, Sparrow finally has a female counterpart who is his match, and while their meeting is somewhat awkward, she’s easily the best female character they’ve introduced in the franchise; many of her scenes with Depp will make you want to see more of them together if they do another one. Even so, the best thing going for the movie is the introduction of Ian McShane’s Blackbeard, a villainous pirate even more downright evil than Captain Davy Jones, something we see a number of times although he doesn’t enter the picture for a good 45 minutes. It’s not a big stretch for McShane, but he does make up for the fact that Geoffrey Rush seems to be coasting through the movie.

Then there are the mermaids, who are introduced in a glamorous and fantastical way before it turns into a scene straight out of “Piranha 3D,” with them sporting fangs and attacking a group of pirates. If you’re thinking of bringing small children to see this movie, you may want to be careful because those with delicate sensibilities may find this scene quite horrifying.

This eventually sets up a romance between the two newest actors, Sam Claflin as a missionary named Philip and Astrid Berges-Frisbey as the mermaid Syrena. Since neither actor has the presence of an Orlando Bloom nor Keira Knightley, this romance seems more like a distraction than anything else. Since you never really care about either character, Syrena being in danger at the hands of Blackbeard does little to stir emotion. It does a little bit better introducing new pirates like Stephen’s Graham Scrum who does bring something new to the mix, though not enough to want to see him back. Similarly, a cameo by Keith Richards as Jack’s father feels more forced than welcome this time around.

For a story that’s supposed to be simpler than the last few movies, this one is just as complicated and confusing as we cut back and forth between the separate journeys by Sparrow, Blackbeard and Angelica and Barbossa with Gibbs. The writing is decent if not spectacular, many of the jokes in the first half falling flat for one reason or another, but mainly because between Sparrow’s drunken slur, the fast pace of the dialogue and all the heavy accents, it’s hard to understand what anyone is saying.

Despite the weaker material, director Rob Marshall proves to be more than capable of taking the reins of the franchise from Gore Verbinski, even if other than a lot of big sword fights, there aren’t that many huge FX pieces on the scale of The Kraken from the second movie. At times, it feels like they’re trying too hard to replicate what made the first movie work so well by retreading familiar territory, whether it’s a sword fight in the rafters or a scene where Jack is held at the point of two swords then they throw the swords up in the air. Sure, these could be seen as homages to earlier movies, but one would hope if Bruckheimer felt the need for a fourth film, a little more time would have been put into creating original fight sequences. This is clearly what separates a visionary like Verbinski and the “work-for-hire” nature of Marshall’s direction.

Overall, the film look quite grand due to a fantastic production design team, but the problem with shooting digital is that it’s lacking the magical fairy dust that shooting on film brings to a fantasy adventure like this. You can see every single detail and every pore, but because of that, it loses some of the naturalism to make it feel real. The scenes shot on soundstages feel like sets, and it doesn’t do much to help the make-up on characters like Barbossa and Blackbeard. Since the film is shot in 3D, it’s a lot more effective as a 3D film than other recent offerings, but it also takes the eyes quite some time to adjust to the sharpness of the image and for the brain to process all that added data.

Because we’ve seen three other movies of essentially the same thing, it’s not hard to figure out where things are going from any given minute to the next, and ultimately, that makes for an adventure that’s rarely very exciting. [Source ]

Kung Fu Panda 2 Movie 2011 Review

Kung Fu Panda 2 Movie 2011 ReviewMovie: Kung Fu Panda 2
Release Date: May 26, 2011 (3D/2D theaters and IMAX 3D)
Studio: DreamWorks Animation
Director: Jennifer Yuh Nelson
Screenwriter: Jonathan Aibel, Glenn Berger
Starring: Jack Black, Angelina Jolie, Dustin Hoffman, Gary Oldman, Jackie Chan, Seth Rogen, Lucy Liu, David Cross, James Hong, Michelle Yeoh
Genre: Animation, Adventure

Summary:
“Kung Fu Panda 2″ is one of those rare sequels that are as good as the original. It’s also a film that both adults and children can enjoy. Check it out in theaters as the 3D on the big screen enhances the animation.

Story:
Since the first “Kung Fu Panda,” Po has fully embraced his role as the Dragon Warrior. He now fights alongside the Furious Five defending China and he enjoys every minute of it.

But when Po faces off with a gang of mysterious bandits, he unexpectedly experiences a flashback from his childhood. He realizes that the bandits and an evil peacock named Lord Shen were somehow involved in him being separated from his biological parents as an infant. Unsure what his flashbacks mean, Po finds his inner peace out of balance.

As Lord Chen unleashes his plan to rule China with a new ultimate weapon, Po and the Furious Five are called upon to stop him. But Po will have to face his dark past and restore his inner peace in order to save the day.

“Kung Fu Panda 2″ is rated PG for sequences of martial arts action and mild violence.

What Worked:
“Kung Fu Panda 2″ is one of those rare sequels that live up to the original. Everything that made the first film so much fun is still here and done in a way that doesn’t feel like a simple rehash of the first movie.

Po is still his lovable, fat self and he’s perfectly voiced by Jack Black. One of the things that make Po so much fun is how much he loves his role as a hero. He loves kung fu, he loves his friends, and he loves being the Dragon Warrior. It’s a refreshing change from the tortured hero we so often see. There’s a hilarious moment where Po and the Furious Five are flying into battle and Po takes a brief second to enjoy the moment and yell out, “I love you guys!” It’s a funny bit that perfectly captures the essence of Po. Jack Black is again supported by the excellent voice cast from the first movie. Angelina Jolie, Seth Rogen, Jackie Chan, Dustin Hoffman, David Cross, and Lucy Liu are all overshadowed by Black, but they are also all given moments to shine and generate laughs. James Hong also really stands out as Mr. Ping, Po’s adopted father. He provides some of the more touching moments of the story while still providing laughs as the silly looking goose.

The new villain for the movie is Gary Oldman as Lord Shen. On paper a villainous peacock is kind of a hard sell, but between Oldman’s voice and the brilliant character animation, Shen becomes a formidable baddie. Also look for brief appearances by Jean-Claude Van Damme as Master Croc, Michelle Yeoh as The Soothsayer, Dennis Haysbert as Master Oxen, Victor Garber as Master Thundering Rhino, and Danny McBride as the wold bandit.

3D is often hit or miss in movies. Sometimes it’s almost unnoticeable while other times it really enhances the moviegoing experience. In “Kung Fu Panda 2″ it really enhances the animation. As Po and the Furious Five fly through the air, they literally fly out of the screen at you. As Lord Shen points his blade at the camera, it comes out of the screen. You see every hair on Shifu’s head, every ripple on a pond, and every chain hanging in a munitions factory. The 3D really helps you appreciate the animation on another level.

I also have to mention that the fight scenes are quite spectacular. They’re a great mix of true action-adventure and cartoon violence. Tigress and Po gracefully fly through the air battling bad guys in a spectacular display of martial arts, but they also do so by bouncing the villains off of Po’s belly, throwing him around comically, and dispatching bad guys in a manner worthy of Wyle E. Coyote… or possibly even Jackie Chan. The end result is a fun sight to behold.

On a final positive note, the movie ends on a great cliffhanger that shows what we can expect in a “Kung Fu Panda 3.” You’ll want to see more once you see it. (Also note that there’s no bonus scene after the credits like there was in the first movie. Take your kids out to pee instead.)

What Didn’t Work:
The only criticism I can really give “Kung Fu Panda 2″ is that it is somewhat predictable. Even before you watch the movie you know that Po is going to defeat Lord Shen and save the day. And even in the first 5 minutes you can tell how he’s going to defeat him. All that remains is how the movie will unfold in-between. But, honestly, that’s a minor gripe. We know Thor, Green Lantern, and Captain America are going to save the day, too, and that doesn’t make them any less enjoyable.

The Bottom Line:
“Kung Fu Panda 2″ is a movie that is fun for both adults and children. It’s one of those rare family films that are truly enjoyable for the whole family. And even if you don’t have kids it is worth checking out, especially in 3D on the big screen.[ Source ]

The Hangover Part II 2011 Movie Review

The Hangover Part II Online FreeMovie: The Hangover Part II
Release Date: May 26, 2011
Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Director: Todd Phillips
Screenwriter: Scot Armstrong, Todd Phillips, Craig Mazin
Starring: Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms, Zach Galifianakis, Jeffrey Tambor, Mike Tyson, Justin Bartha, Ken Jeong, Bryan Callen, Nick Cassavetes
Genre: Comedy

Review:
After getting drunk, drugged, stealing a tiger, a police car and a small Asian man – and misplacing their best friend in the process – you would think Phil (Bradley Cooper), Stu (Ed Helms) and Alan (Zach Galifianakis) would have learned their lesson about having ‘one last night out with the guys.’ But apparently not, because when it’s Stu’s turn at the altar, the members of the ‘Wolfpack’ find themselves living Santayana’s famous aphorism as literally possible.

The result is one of the laziest sequels made in quite a while.

A lot of what made the original “Hangover” work is still visible in “The Hangover Part II” mainly because returning director Todd Phillips and his screenwriters have taken the expedient of repeating the first film in so many details and with so few variations, it’s hard to find a reason to bother watching the new one. You’d be just as well off watching the first one over again.

The constant demand for a sequel is ‘the same but different.’ It could be the details of the world created, or dangling plot threads or just really interesting characters, and then taken and developed further. But Phillips isn’t having any truck with that, instead putting the same characters through the exact same ringer as before.

There are some differences but they’re all so superficial they make no real difference. The action has been moved from Vegas to Bangkok. The wedding is Stu’s, not best friend Doug (who is excluded from the entire adventure despite being conscious and available this time around), and the person missing is the little brother (Mason Lee) of Stu’s fiancée. And the tiger and baby have been combined in the form of a drug-selling monkey.

But the actual actions all of these ‘changes’ provoke are entirely the same as before, and there is nothing less funny than a joke you already know the punchline to.

To be fair, a lot of that is true only in relation to the first film and judging it for what it’s not instead of for what it is. So what is “The Hangover Part II” actually? Sporadically funny but also missing the extra ‘something’ needed to go from mediocre to good.

If you’ve seen the first what’s missing is surprise and no matter how fair you try to be, that will be hard to get past. A lot of the original’s biggest laughs were tied in with the plot as much as their individual set ups and losing that extra leg knocks a lot of the foundation off balance. Phillips and company have thought long and hard about how far over the top to take some of their gags and they’ve gone a pretty fair way. Surprise combined with horror is the hallmark of Phillips’ comic style and he’s trying as hard as he can to top himself with “The Hangover Part II,” but that focus only goes as far as the actual gags themselves. It feels less like “The Hangover Part II” than it does like “The Hangover” 2.0, as if Phillips were trying to go back and make the first film funnier instead of making a new one.

On the other hand, if you’ve never seen the original “The Hangover Part II” does work much better as the kind of madcap romp the filmmakers seem to have in mind as the ‘Wolfpack’ hook up with the scene stealing Chow (Ken Jeong) again to try and find what part of Bangkok’s underbelly they left Teddy in. But the connections between and development of the characters are completely absent; outside of Stu, Phil and Alan are along basically just because they were part of the group the first time around and are expected to be back. It’s a problem especially visible with Cooper, who doesn’t have Galifianakis’ mugging ability and whose character did all the developing he was going to do already.

“The Hangover Part II” is decently funny, but it’s also a colossal waste of time. The filmmakers have put so little effort into creating something new even the jokes suffer because we already know how it’s all going to come out. [ Source ]

Beginners Movie 2011 Review

Beginners-Movie-2011Movie: Beginners
Release Date: June 3, 2011
Studio: Focus Features
Director: Mike Mills
Screenwriter: Mike Mills
Starring: Ewan McGregor, Christopher Plummer, Melanie Laurent, Goran Visnjic
Genre: Comedy, Drama

Story:
Graphic artist Oliver Fields (Ewan McGregor) has been trying to come to terms with the fact his widower father Hal (Christopher Plummer) decided to come out of the closet at the age of 75 before being stricken by cancer. Months after his father’s death, Oliver meets the enigmatic Anna (Mélanie Laurent) at a party; they’re immediately attracted to each other but each are trying to deal with personal issues that might impede their happiness.

Analysis:
The idea of a 75-year-old widower coming out of the closet might sound like an absurd premise for a movie if you didn’t realize that aspect of Mike Mills’ follow-up to his quirky debut “Thumbsucker” actually comes from his own life. Oddly, this semi-autobiographical dramedy makes Mills’ adaptation of Walter Kirn seem conventional by comparison partially due to the film’s dual non-linear story structure that cuts between Oliver’s quest for love with Anna and his last years with his father. It’s a film that’s very aware of itself in the way it breaks the fourth wall or switches into different narrative styles with Mills’ quirky sensibilities always in full effect.

It opens with a subdued scene of Oliver cleaning up his father’s house after his passing as he reflects back on his father’s decision to really enjoy life and start dating following his wife’s death. When Oliver is dragged out to a costume party by his worried friends, he meets an odd French actress (Mélanie Laurent) and things go so well, it seems too good to be true, except that she has her own father issues. Hal’s death leaves Oliver having to care for his affection-seeking Jack Russell terrier Arthur, who communicates via philosophical subtitles as a Greek chorus to Oliver’s burgeoning romance.

Mills proves himself equally capable at making you smile and feel good with the sweetness of Oliver’s romance or his scene-stealing dog, then move you with some of the most honest raw emotions on display. In exploring this fractured soul, Mills has written one of the most original and poignant screenplays we’re likely to see this year. It’s not a complicated film by any means, partially because so much of its attention is focused on a stripped-down cast of three characters. Once you know the general premise, there aren’t too many surprising story developments especially in the flashbacks to Hal, since we already know the outcome.

Ewan McGregor has really grown into his own skin as an actor, and he brings something special to his scenes both with Plummer and Laurent. It’s hard to put into words why he’s so perfect for the role other than the way he approaches the character with a subtlety that doesn’t require a lot of words to really understand everything he’s feeling. By now, it’s not even remotely surprising when Christopher Plummer pulls out a performance as rounded as he does with Hal, Oliver’s complicated father, and his view on life after coming out is just a joy to experience, because it’s so inspirational. More surprising is an almost unrecognizable Goran Visnjic as Andy, the emotionally immature guy Hal starts dating. Anyone who fell in love with Mélanie Laurent as the tough cinema manager looking for vengeance in Quentin Tarantino’s “Inglourious Basterds” will fall even further seeing her in this sort of romantic role. Another standout is Mary Page Keller as Oliver’s eccentric mother Georgia who we see in flashbacks to his childhood, which give us more of an idea of why he is the way he is.

The results are an incredibly creative film that allows Mills to explore all of his artistic sides to create a film that has similar qualities as Michel Gondry’s “The Science of Sleep,” one of that auteur’s more personal films. At times, Mills’ creativity veers into territory that verges on pretentiousness, but that’s quickly tempered with scenes with such a strong emotional aspect, he’s forgiven for being an artiste. It’s also fun to see how he incorporates his own background as a graphic artist into Oliver, whose mood starts to affect his work.

Considering his music background, one might expect Mils to take the path of least resistance and incorporate all sorts of hipster alt-rock into the mix, but instead, he takes a far more unconventional route going with pre-’60s music or simple piano music, which also helps to give the movie its own identity.

The Bottom Line:
Mills delivers another film full of poise and poignancy that’s emotionally-devastating, especially if you’ve ever lost a parent or loved one to cancer yourself, but it’s also an enjoyable experience since he’s clearly a filmmaker who has found his own unique way of exploring familiar territory.[Source]

Canonical URL by SEO No Duplicate WordPress Plugin