The Book of Eli Movie Review

Cast:
Denzel Washington as Eli
Gary Oldman as Carnegie
Mila Kunis as Solara
Ray Stevenson as Redridge
Jennifer Beals as Claudia
Evan Jones as Martz
Joe Pingue as Hoyt
Frances de la Tour as Martha
Michael Gambon as George
Tom Waits as Engineer
Chris Browning as Hijack Leader

Directed by Albert and Allen Hughes

Summary:
Like a cross between “The Road Warrior” and “Deadwood,” “The Book of Eli” is rarely as good as either, more of a generic post-Apocalypse movie with a few cool action scenes and a mostly ridiculous premise.

Story:
After a devastating event that leaves the earth a barren wasteland, a lone man (Denzel Washington) carries an important sacred relic to a faraway location, but when he comes across a heavily-populated town, he falls foul of the local overlord Carnegie (Gary Oldman) who wants the book and will do anything to get it.

Analysis:
Clearly the biggest hurdle facing the first movie from the Hughes Brothers since their Jack the Ripper thriller “From Hell,” is that it’s coming out so soon after John Hillcoat’s adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s “The Road.” As the movie opens with Denzel Washington as an unnamed wanderer–he’s only attached to the name “Eli” much later in the movie–in a post-apocalyptic wasteland, you can’t help but notice the similarity in the visuals with a far superior film. As much as “The Book of Eli” tries to offer a similar level of intelligence, it might have been better off sticking to the action, which is used more to distract from the weak storytelling.

Only the first fifteen or twenty minutes of the movie resembles “The Road,” since once Washington’s character gets to the town overrun by gangs controlled by Gary Oldman’s Carnegie, clearly meant to resemble the classic Westerns of loners coming to clean up a town, we get to the meat of the story. Carnegie thinks the book Eli is carrying will allow him to the take control of the illiterate people roaming what’s left of the world, and Eli finds a supporter and confidante in Mila Kunis’ Solara, a young bartender who has become indentured to Carnegie due to his control over her blind mother, played by Jennifer Beals.

With the number of great post-apocalyptic movies we’ve seen over the years, it never feels like “The Book of Eli” has that much more to offer storywise, except for its obvious Western tropes and its premise of a “sacred book” that everyone is trying to get. Not that it’s difficult to figure out the book’s “secret,” but all the talk of how powerful this book is as a weapon feels like it’s pandering not only to those who regularly read and cite it but also to those who don’t believe in it. (Figured it out yet? Yes, it’s that simple.) The film’s marketing is deceptive because you’re given the impression this is first and foremost an action movie set in a dystopian future ala “Mad Max,” but instead, the movie gets bogged down in exposition about the significance of the central plot device.

That said, the Hughes are amazing visual directors with a flair for creating exciting action scenes, whether it’s violent limb-severing fights, extravagant shootouts or just blowing things up real good. These are clearly the movie’s strongest moments, but they’re also scattered throughout the movie, the rest of it involving the characters jabbering about many things we can mostly figure out on our own. We never really learn what happened to the world or how any of the characters got to the point where they were. One of the more disconcerting aspects of this world is how violence against women has become so common place, as we watch how every single female character is in danger of being raped, robbed and/or killed at one point in the movie. Even so, the reason the movie never quite achieves any of the intelligence it’s striving for is because the quality of writing and acting are just never up to snuff.

Washington does a satisfactory job with a mostly-silent character that brings back fond memories of Clint Eastwood’s “Man with No Name,” but he’s surrounded by actors who just aren’t on his level except for Oldman, the only one who can effortlessly go toe-to-toe with Washington, even if he sometimes takes things overboard as the baddie. There are a lot of weaker actors playing the vandals Washington meets and kills while on the road, but the most severe miscasting is that of Mila Kunis in a dramatic role she just doesn’t have the skill to sell. The many quieter scenes between Washington and Kunis are dull at best and aggravating at worst because they are so badly matched. As nice as it is seeing Beals back on screen, it’s a fairly unnecessary role and her performance is relatively flat. Likewise, chronic scene-stealer Michael Gambon and Frances de la Tour attempt shaky (presumably) Southern accents as an odd elderly couple the duo meet on their journey, but they’re both sorely wasted since their characters only appear for a few brief minutes, not enough time to have much of an impact.

Even if you buy the ridiculous premise about the power of this “book,” you’re still likely to get thrown by the even more ludicrous plot twist in the last ten minutes that will have you questioning just about every aspect of the movie leading up until that point.

The Bottom Line:
Neither the great production design nor the cool action scenes can make up for the relatively weak and generic storytelling with character types we’ve already seen far too many times before as well as a ludicrous plot twist that’s just plain aggravating.

Leap Year Movie Review

Cast:
Amy Adams as Anna Brady
Matthew Goode as Declan
Adam Scott as Jeremy
John Lithgow as Jack
Noel O’Donovan as Seamus
Tony Rohr as Frank
Pat Laffan as Donal
Alan Devlin as Joe
Ian McElhinney as Priest
Dominique McElligott as Bride
Mark O’Regan as Captain
Maggie McCarthy as Eileen
Peter O’Meara as Ron
Macdara Ó Fatharta as Father Malone
Kaitlin Olson as Libby

Directed by Anand Tucker

Summary:
Predictable as hell but ultimately delivering exactly what’s advertised, the fun rapport between Adams and Goode is often enough to keep this movie from totally sinking into its own formula-driven plot.

Story:
Anna Brady (Amy Adams) has the perfect relationship with her boyfriend Jeremy (Adam Scott) except that after four years together, he hasn’t asked her to marry him, so she decides to take the initiative and follow him to Dublin and pop the question on Leap Day. (It’s an Irish tradition apparently.) Instead, she gets stranded in the middle of nowhere and has to rely on a gruff local cab driver named Declan (Matthew Goode) to get her to Dublin.

Analysis:
The thought of sitting through another formulaic Hollywood romantic comedy so soon after the last two is enough to make any film critic want to throw down their notepad and quit, especially when you’re presented with as obvious a “meet cute” premise as this one. Even so, “Leap Year” has enough saving graces that insures that it’s rarely more or less than what’s promised from the genre: a little bit of romance and a few laughs.

The first act introducing Amy Adams’ character Anna bodes poorly for the rest of the movie, because she seems to be a fairly typical rom-com heroine – successful in her career but unhappy with her relationship and willing to do whatever it takes to fix that. In this case, it involves flying after her traveling boyfriend, played by Adam Scott as the same yuppie dirtbag he’s done so well in movies like “Step Brothers,” and proposing to him on February 29 in Dublin, following an Irish tradition. Instead, she gets stranded in a small village hundreds of miles away and she hires a gruff local bartender and cab driver to take her to Dublin.

It’s essentially the same formula we’ve seen countless times before: throw together two attractive individuals of the opposite sex from different backgrounds, and watch as they fight their inevitable attraction for as long as possible. Normally, it can be a grueling experience, but Adams is generally likeable enough even in her worst moments making this easier to tolerate. Fans of Adams’ previous work might have higher hopes for the actress than having to resort to the type of ridiculous physical humor sometimes required, but she handles the humiliation well, and her reactions to an entire hotel room falling to pieces from one wrong move is great stuff. Unfortunately, she also seems to be getting stuck in the same one-note role she played in “Julie & Julia”–even saying “yum” at one point–so hopefully, this will be the last time we see this sort of role for the two-time Oscar nominee.

Movies like this can often be especially painful for guys, because they’re so slanted towards the female perspective that every guy is a walking stereotype, so it’s refreshing that this doesn’t go down the normal route of making Adams’ traveling partner completely detestable. Instead, Matthew Goode plays Declan with enough of a warm roguish charm (and a more than convincing Irish accent) to make the perfect foil for Adams, delivering his barbs in a way that makes the recurring bits quite enjoyable. One can easily see Goode achieving a similar love by American women as Hugh Grant, as long as he diversifies with different roles and doesn’t get dragged too far into romantic comedy hell.

Director Anand Tucker proves himself to be a more than competent at delivering everything the film requires from the lighter physical humor to the sweeter romantic moments, and the movie looks quite good, especially the scenic Irish vistas that act as the story’s backdrop.

As you much as you might want to hate the movie for its stubborn adherence to formula, there’s no denying the chemistry between the two leads does win you over once you get past the silly physical stuff. The combined charm of the duo makes it fun to watch the ups and downs of their relationship, and there are more than a few sweet and romantic moments, as well as a couple of scenes that play in their inherent sexuality, only done in a way that’s fairly pure and innocent. Adam Scott only appears in the movie long enough to make it obvious how wrong his character is for Anna, and it doesn’t take a film degree to know where things will go once they’re finally reunited. Even knowing these results going into the movie, it would take a fairly hard and cold soul to not be even slightly warmed up by the film’s romantic coda.

The Bottom Line:
Women looking for a little romance with some light humor thrown in for good measure could do far worse than this by-the-books “meet cute” rom-com. Anyone expecting anything more than what’s offered by the trailer won’t find much.

Youth in Revolt Movie Review

Cast:
Michael Cera as Nick Twisp and Francois Dillinger
Portia Doubleday as Sheeni Saunders
Jean Smart as Estelle Twisp
Zach Galifianakis as Jerry
Erik Knudsen as Lefty
Adhir Kalyan as Vijay Joshi
Steve Buscemi as George Twisp
Fred Willard as Mr. Ferguson
Ari Graynor as Lacey
Ray Liotta as Lance Wescott
Justin Long as Paul Saunders
Rooney Mara as Taggarty
Jade Fusco as Bernice Lynch
Lise Lacasse as Matron
M. Emmet Walsh as Mr. Saunders

Directed by Miguel Arteta

Summary:
Quirky and strange at times for sure, but Michael Cera really carries this coming-of-age comedy in ways he hasn’t quite done in his previous roles.

Story:
While on a family vacation, teenager Nick Twisp (Michael Cera) meets the beautiful and smart Sheeni Saunders (Portia Doubleday) and falls instantly in love, but he soon learns the only way to earn her heart is to do bad deeds, so Nick invents an evil alter-ego, Francois Dillinger (also Cera) who helps Nick do whatever it takes to win Sheeni over.

Analysis:
It’s been a long road for C.D. Payne’s cult novel to come to the screen, and much of it finally getting there can be attributed to actor Michael Cera who was a fan of Payne’s dark coming-of-age comedy about a teen virgin who’ll do anything to be with a young woman he falls for. The movie version of Payne’s novel also marks the welcome return of indie filmmaker Miguel Arteta with his first feature film since “The Good Girl,” arguably Jennifer Aniston’s best role and movie. Pairing the actor and director produces similarly satisfying results.

When we meet Nick, he lives in a house in Portland with his oversexed mother (Jean Smart) and her latest boyfriend Jerry (Zack Galifianakis), but when Jerry falls foul of some navy officers, they go into hiding in the family’s vacation trailer park on a lake. There, Nick meets the smart and sexy Sheeni Saunders and immediately becomes infatuated with her, setting in motion an elaborate plan to be reunited with her once he returns home. This plan requires Nick going against character and “being bad,” so he creates an alter-ego in Francois Dillenger, a well-dressed but foul-mouthed chainsmoking S.O.B. who always knows what to say and do in any situation.

Very much in the vein of indie comedies like “Adventureland” and “Rocket Science,” but also harking back as far as Dustin Hoffman in “The Graduate,” this is another great look at what great lengths a guy will go to in order to win over a woman, and as outlandish as Nick’s journey might get at times, it’s also paved with situations firmly grounded in reality. What keeps the movie so engaging is watching Nick’s transformation from when we first meet him through the end game. It’s a role perfectly suited for Cera, playing up to his comic strengths but also allowing him to branch out by playing multiple characters, often at the same time. Francois is so different from the normal Cera character you can’t help but be amused by the scenes they share as Francois steps in to do and say all the things Nick would never dare.

Portia Doubleday is quite a fine discovery as Sheeni Saunders, a character in the same mold as the title character in “(500) Days of Summer,” exuding the type of knowing “Lolita” sexuality that makes it easy to understand why Nick goes nuts trying to do everything in his powers to be with her. The writing isn’t as finely tuned as “(500) Days,” but you generally know that the relationship between Nick and Sheeni could never possibly work out, though watching Nick doing everything in his powers to make it work is infinitely entertaining.

Much of the humor is driven by the eccentric characters surrounding Nick and how he deals with them, the strangest relationship being the one with his mother, a middle-aged woman clearly tired from raising a son and constantly in need of a man to attend to her emotional demands. At first, that role is filled by Galifianakis’ Jerry, acting as oddly as he did in “The Hangover,” but it’s a small role who only appears a few times in the first act. After he leaves the picture, that role falls to Ray Liotta as a police officer who is more than happy to get Nick out of the house and sending him to live with his father, who just happens to live in the same town as Sheeni.

The film hits a lull in the second act as Nick and his Indian friend Vijay (Adhir Kalyan) take a road trip to Santa Cruz where Sheeni has been sent to a French prep school by her ultra-religious parents to get her further away from the troublemaking Nick. At this points, the film veers closer to movies like “Harold & Kumar” or even “Porky’s,” being more about the two of them trying to get laid. Their trip to find Sheeni also introduces a number of subplots that threatens to clutter things up, but all of it comes together well in the fast-moving third act that includes a number of funny moments with Justin Long and Fred Willard.

The movie’s a little too strange at times for its own good, but one has to give Arteta lots of credit for finding a way to make all of the disparate characters and storylines fit together into a coherent film that never feels disjointed or erratic. Arteta’s use of music and even a couple of animated transitions help tie everything together well, creating a surprisingly well-paced film that includes lots of fine character bits and even an impressive set piece where we get to watch Nick’s alter-ego Francois at his most destructive.

The Bottom Line:
If you’re a fan of Michael Cera or even if you’ve gotten to the point where you’ve tired of him doing “his thing,” this quirky dark comedy offers you 90 minutes of him not just doing what he does best but also showing that he has a few new tricks up his sleeve.

Sherlock Holmes Movie Review

Cast:
Robert Downey Jr. as Sherlock Holmes
Jude Law as Dr. John Watson
Rachel McAdams as Irene Adler
Mark Strong as Lord Blackwood
Eddie Marsan as Inspector Lestrade
Robert Maillet as Dredger
Geraldine James as Mrs. Hudson
Kelly Reilly as Mary Morstan
William Houston as Constable Clark
Hans Matheson as Lord Coward
James Fox as Sir Thomas
William Hope as Ambassador Standish
Clive Russell as Captain Tanner
Oran Gurel as Reordan
David Garrick as McMurdo

Review:
It’s Victorian England and crime is afoot, and that can only mean one thing: Sherlock Holmes is on the case. After a considerable absence from the big screen, Holmes is set to return in all of his clue-deducing, kung-fu action-adventure glory.

Wait. What?

Yes, Holmes (Robert Downey, Jr.) and venerable associate Watson (Jude Law) have been given the full Hollywood makeover. Not content merely to observe, deduce and explain, Holmes and Co. jump into the fray with fists and guns blazing (can fists blaze? nevermind, doesn’t matter) in Guy Ritchie’s (“Snatch”) big budget attempt at the detective.

And it more or less works, mainly because of Downey’s ability to get you to go along with whatever he’s doing.

After solving the case of the fiendish Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong), Holmes is forced to return to the one mystery his powers of deduction fail him at; human beings. With Watson preparing to move out and begin his life as a married man and the only woman he’s ever been attracted to (Rachel McAdams) is an inveterate criminal, it’s no wonder he quickly falls into a stupor of despondency and misanthropism. That is, until Lord Blackwood rises from the grave to kill again.

It’s actually not as crazy as it sounds. There’s quite a bit from the original material at play, only… more so. Like any good adaptation, the Ritchie and his cadre of screenwriters have kept what they liked and minimalized what they didn’t, staying faithful to the original but certainly putting their own stamp on it.

Tossed out the window wholesale is Holmes’ aloofness and Watson’s dogged loyalty. Our modern day versions bicker and fight more like real brothers than perfect fictional archetypes.

And that’s the real trick that makes “Sherlock Holmes” play. It would, has been in fact, extremely easy to treat the character with kid gloves, instead of as a role to be performed. To take him only as far as the material goes, but no further.

Downey and Ritchie’s version, however… it would be a real stretch to say he seems like a real person. He’s far too much larger than life for that. But he doesn’t feel boxed-in by the material.

After Blackwood rises from the dead, Holmes finds himself hired by a secret cabal of would-be magicians to find out what Blackwood is up to and stop him. As he and Watson examine the remains of Blackwood’s grave, it’s the perfect time for the film to stop for the classic Holmes battle cry: “the game’s afoot!”

But rather than stop there, Downey and Law continue on through to the end of the quote from Shakespeare’s “Henry V,” turning the moment from a staged recreation to a real, private joke between friends. And it’s so much more affecting that way. It’s as if the characters of the books were a watered down version left us by Holmes’ biographers, while this version is closer to how it really was. If you squint real hard.

Holmes likes to drink and fight and detests the mothering of his landlady, Mrs. Hudson (Geraldine James). Watson has a gambling problem strong enough that Holmes has to hold onto his checkbook, and he has enough of a spine to stand up to Holmes’ frequent bullying.

It is almost always in the moments with its characters, especially between Holmes and Watson–who himself has been bulked up into much more competent, rough and tumble ex-military man–that “Sherlock Holmes” really shines.

It’s a bit of a one-sided relationship, however. Watson by himself isn’t particularly interesting, only in his reflection and reaction to Holmes. But that’s okay because when Holmes is on screen it’s hard to care about much else.

The filmmakers have done an excellent job in conceiving the Holmes they want to portray, but this really is a case of the singer, not the song. Downey’s Holmes is irascible, exploitative and rude, but also energetic and ready for a brawl whenever it comes his way. It’s over the top as all get out, but in Downey’s hands it works.

The only thing really missing is Holmes’ classic deductive ability, which only gets a few uses, leaving him more of an action hero than a detective. But it’s only a small false note among a handful of generally excellent ones. The production design and cinematography are first rate, the smallest characters are well drawn and used, and Hans Zimmer delivers one of his best scores in years.

Purists can, and certainly will, spend much time arguing how much is true to the material (Watson has his limp! Holmes did know Bartitsu!) and how much was changed (there’s no cocaine! He never saw Irene Adler again!) but the rest won’t, and shouldn’t care. The fact is, “Sherlock Holmes” is just down right entertaining.

Don’t look too far under the surface because much of it is quite typical big-budget adventure filmmaking, but on the surface it’s got a great regard for character and humor, more so than a lot of films of its stripe, and terrific performance from Downey to tie it all together. There are other flashy movies out there for people who prefer that, but if “Sherlock Holmes” is proof of anything, it’s that a great actor is the best effect of all.

Canonical URL by SEO No Duplicate WordPress Plugin